December 28th, 2008

Sita Sings the Blues    

Posted by Laura.

Laura The animation blog Cartoon Brew, for the better part of a year now has been singing the praises of Sita Sings the Blues, a full-length animated movie made single-handedly by indie comic artist Nina Paley. It depicts stories of love and betrayal between Prince Rama and his wife Sita from the Indian epic Ramayana, interwoven with the personal story of Paley’s long-distance breakup with her husband. Along the way there are three Indians doing a voice-over, Creature Comforts-style, debating the finer details of Sita’s story (was she or wasn’t she wearing jewellery when she was abducted?) These seemingly unrelated themes are woven together using 1920’s songs sung by jazz singer Annette Hanshaw. Apparently the movie works, and surprisingly well.

Here’s a trailer, featuring the voice-overs and lots of trippy artwork:

I say “apparently”, because this movie is in distribution limbo and is unable to be seen by anyone. The Annette Hanshaw performances are in the public domain; not so the actual songs. (It’s exactly the same silliness that keeps a song as old as “Happy Birthday”—written in 1893!—under copyright.) Paley (or the film’s distributors) would have to fork out almost a quarter of a million dollars to secure the rights to use these songs in her movie; an insurmountable amount for a tiny indie film during a recession.

Scene from Sita Sings the Blues

Enter the 500-lb gorilla, Roger Ebert, who published a lengthy rave about the movie on his blog. Ebert enjoyed it so much he invited Paley and her movie to appear at his personal film festival in April. (BTW, whether or not you like Ebert’s actual movie critiques, his blog articles are superb, and features the most interesting, civilized and well-written commentaries by readers I’ve ever read … this blog’s readers excepted! :-) )

Since the Ebert post, Nina Paley has revealed her distribution plan for Sita Sings the Blues. Basically she will place Sita in the public domain, by uploading the film on archive.org and various mirror sites, and calling them “promotional copies”. Promotional copies of a work are exempt from most song licence fees. Paley will not make any money directly from her movie. Instead, she hopes to earn money by “donations, commissions, grants, patrons, speaking fees”. Sounds an awful lot like the life of artists before the rise of the rights-owning mega-corporations.

February 15, 2009 Update

Comment by David "Prefers The Ramayana Over The Bhagavad-Gita" Barker — December 30, 2008 @ 10:03 am

The review is completely un-Ebert-like. But the movie sounds (and looks) sweet. I hope you can snag a promotional copy for review purposes. I also would like to review it. InkWay. InkWay.

Ebert can be very non-objective (sic) in his reviews. Paley is from his hometown and is the daughter of a mayor so perhaps that alone explains his ardour, but I hope not. When the movie about Iris Murdoch came out a few years back, he trashed it on his TV review show because he was a fan of her books and hated seeing her portrayed in her decline into Alzheimer’s, no matter that the movie might actually have been good (Don’t know, never saw it, never read Iris Murdoch).

Comment by Laura — December 30, 2008 @ 11:32 am

I hear you about Ebert—I don’t always agree with his formal reviews, or sometimes even think they’re particularly interestingly-written. However, I’ll give him credit: He usually states his prejudices, political leanings and other biases right up front—which is a lot more honest than most other critics. Most critics would like you to believe they’re being strictly objective, but that isn’t really possible if the review is to be anything more than a recap of the plot.

I enjoy his blog a lot more than his reviews, because it’s personal, heartfelt and occasionally silly (though his most recent post must’ve been written when he was in a particularly bleak mood.

December 22nd, 2008

Cake Wrecks    

Posted by Laura.

Laura No, we haven’t fallen off the edge of the earth! Usually the client work drops off by early December; this year it picked up considerably. Such is the life of freelancers!

Here’s a fun website that I’ve been reading for a few months, to tide you over until we have something interesting in our lives to blog about: Cake Wrecks, which features disastrously-decorated cakes (done by so-called professional cake decorators, though admittedly a lot of them are of Safeway- or Walmart-caliber quality.)

The following cake wreck made me snort, though. (Both photos from Cake Wrecks.)

This is what the bride requested:

Braveheart-style wedding cake

What she ended up with:

What on earth is that?

Comment by Pamela Cook — December 23, 2008 @ 10:45 am

Yikes Funny how it looks like it been drop a couple of times. It looks better if you put the the bride or groom face in it. Lol

Comment by Diane K. — December 24, 2008 @ 6:05 pm

You guys never saw my wedding cake, did you. I’ll have to email you a photo sometime. And perhaps I will send it to the website also. We’ve been married twelve years and I’m still laughing at how it came out.

Comment by Peter Cook — December 24, 2008 @ 8:03 pm

Diane, you should. But I think I speak for all of us when I say that you have a moral obligation to post it here first. If you need don’t have a Flickr account or some such, email the image to one of us, post your commentary, and we’ll add it to your post.

Comment by Diane K. — December 26, 2008 @ 2:10 pm

Okay, you asked for it…

We had a casual, somewhat offbeat wedding, but we wanted a nice cake. We went to a bakery recommended by a friend, who had had a beautiful wedding cake, and asked for a single layer with cream-coloured icing and basket-weave sides. Instead of a bride and groom on top, we wanted an outline of a mouse (representing my husband, who worked with mice) and a rabbit (representing me, the bunny lady), nose to nose. I gave them a sketch of the design we wanted — little stylized images — and directed that they be in the same cream icing so it was just a subtle silhouette outlined on top of the cake. Tastefully silly was the goal.

sketch of mouse and rabbit

We asked a family member to swing by and pick up the cake on the way down to the ceremony, which was at my grandmother’s, so we didn’t see it until a couple of minutes before the wedding. On the up side, we got a lot of what we asked for: the cream icing, the basket-weave sides — but apparently the instructions for the image on top got lost in translation.

actually cake final version, with cartoony version not nearly what design was

As you can see, someone seems to have decided that what we wanted was a bit TOO subtle, so they redrew it in full-colour cartoon style. The rabbit looms menacingly over the mouse and they appear to be… boxing? It wasn’t quite the message we wanted.

Oh, well. At least the cake was tasty. And we are still married.

Comment by Eliyahu — December 28, 2008 @ 8:03 pm

That top one is unbelievable! The only thing I can imagine is that the decorator was feeling tired and decided to let her 6-year-old do the job after giving the kid four cups of coffee and a whole bowl of icing to eat…

December 5th, 2008

RIP, H.M.    

Posted by Laura.

Laura One of the most important figures in the history of brain research—and to me, as a former student of brain and behaviour, one of the most tragic and moving—died earlier this week at the age of 82. Henry Gustav Molaison, better known in the psychological literature as H.M., had a brain operation at the age of 27 to try to alleviate intractable seizures (the result of an accident at the age of 9). The surgery—cutting into the part of the brain called the hippocampus—successfully stopped the seizures, but came with a horrifying side-effect: Molaison could no longer form any long-term memories.

His short-term memory—e.g. remembering a phone number for the length of time needed to dial it—was unaffected, and everything he learned prior to his operation was retained, so he could cope reasonably well with day-to-day existence. However, H.M. never remembered experiencing anything or going anywhere a few seconds after doing it. Even when researchers met with him hundreds of times it was always as if he was meeting them for the first time. Every time he was told of his mother’s death his grief was as fresh as if he’d never been told.

From H.M. it was discovered by Brenda Milner of McGill University, that even though one kind of long-term memory is affected by hippocampal damage, another type of memory is not. H.M. could learn complex and difficult motor tasks (e.g. tracing a star while looking through a mirror); even though he never remembered doing the task, he got noticeably better at it over time. This “muscle memory” is why doing things learned long ago, like playing a once much-practised piece of music, or riding a bicycle, can be performed surprisingly well years later.

After working with hundreds of researchers over the years, H.M. had a vague idea that his story was somehow unusual, but he never could parse the details of why. He did thoroughly learn that he had a bad memory. His only life-lasting memories were ones that predated his 1953 operation, and they eventually lost any narrative thread or context in his existence. He remarked that his life was like constantly waking from a dream.

After his death H.M.’s brain was preserved for study, which will hopefully provide researchers with even more insights from a tragic life.

Comment by Laura — December 6, 2008 @ 2:30 pm

In a lovely article in the New Yorker, the neurologist Oliver Sacks describes the case of Clive Wearing, a musicologist who was stricken by a brain infection that effectively wiped out all of his memories, both pre- and post-illness. His entire existence was based on about 10 seconds of fluid memory, and he could forget that something happened, literally in a blink of an eye. Even though he had very little sense of who he was, he could converse entertainingly (if a bit repetitively), play and compose music with feeling and emotion, and—somehow—unconditionally love his wife and grown children, even though he didn’t always know their names or faces.

December 1st, 2008

Isabella Rossellini’s Green Porno    

Posted by Peter.

Peter In case you hadn’t heard, the multi-talented Isabella Rossellini wrote, co-directed and starred in a series of short films for the Sundance Channel called Green Porno, about different animal mating habits.

Conceived for computers and mobile devices, the films ended up going on the film festival circuit. They weren’t available online to us Canadians for a while, but they are now and well worth watching for their blend of science and cartoony humour/melodrama.

(Personal favourite: Bees. Go you drones.)

Probably NSFW, depending on how stuck up your office is.

Comment by Luisa — December 2, 2008 @ 7:44 pm

Yikes! I’m amused and shocked at the same time! Hmmmm…. should I show Ronnie, or not show Ronnie… Hmmm.

Comment by Meghan Laurie — December 22, 2008 @ 11:15 am

omg..for once i know what you are talking about. i read about this in one of my fashion magazines. i liked the peoples costumes.