December 30th, 2004

New Wheelchair–A Story about Bureaucracy    

Posted by Peter.

After about a year and a half of wrangling with the system, Jon has a new wheelchair.

His old wheelchair was never appropriate for his needs, and only really fit him in the last six months, although it was prescribed five years ago, with a rebuild three years ago. Given the cost of the rebuild, it should have just been replaced–in retrospect was a poor decision, but not ours to make. Though we authorized it. Let me elaborate.

To obtain a wheelchair that is funded (in whole or in part) by the public system, you enter a bureaucratic machine that is still a little overly complicated, to put it gently. I think that every individual involved is doing their best within the system, but I have a few bones to pick with the system itself.

To begin, you talk to a physiotherapist, or in our case (this time), the seating clinic of Bloorview MacMillan, the local hospital for disabled kids, who assigns you a PT. The first question our of their mouths is “Who will be the vendor?”, meaning the private company who will supply and service the wheelchair. The PTs are not allowed to recommend a vendor, which is understandable. Problem is, how are the parents supposed to know of a good one? We don’t even know how many suppliers there might be – wheelchair vendors aren’t exactly likely to be in the local mall! The only people who have a sense of the options out there – who work with all of the suppliers on a daily basis and who are most likely to have an idea of an appropriate vendor – are the physiotherapists, and they are not allowed to have an opinion.

Frustrating. At least in our case we have hooked onto some nice folks at HME Mobility , so off we go.

But as of last year Jon hadn’t grown out of his chair. And since we were asking for some government funding for the chair, the physiotherapists were extremely reluctant to authorize a new chair until he grew too big for the old, bad chair. (Without a compelling reason for a new chair there’s a chance that the government wouldn’t authorize the money. Of course, in my view the fact that Jon couldn’t wheel the old chair without slouching over is a damn good reason, but I guess that’s harder to put on a form than “grew too big”.)

Remember, these chairs are what the physiotherapists worry about in terms of
long-term posture–the kids are sitting in them for eight hours at school, and some of them at home as well. They are very touchy about how an incorrectly-prescribed chair could lead to permanent issues down the road.

But from what I see, if the chair is inappropriate but not too small, you are stuck. I’m sure this disconnect comes from the need to balance the expenditure of government cash with the needs of the child, but it does seem like everything is serving the system, and not the people in need.

As well, parents co-sign for the equipment along with the physioterapist who recommends it, but of course, we are going entirely on the recommendations of the PT. So in the long term it’s deemed as the parents’ fault if the equipment is inappropriate. We were led down the garden path by Jon’s first PT and vendor, and now we’re the ones that gets blamed for it by the current PTs. Grrrr.

As we delayed for growth, we dealt with some other bureaucratic issue on another front, so initial funding concerns for us were resolved and the hospital was told of this in late April, so were given an immediate appointment in… mid August.

This was the most productive meeting: We had a room of experts. The vendor, the therapist and the seating technicians, all taking measurements and discussing which bits and pieces will be the most beneficial for the wheelchairee. Sometimes we had a chance to offer an opinion, but more often it was a flurry of jargon. Occasionally we would interrupt to make sure we got a sense of things. Fair enough. HME was to provide the chair, the hospital would provide the seating. It would happen within 2-3 weeks of provincial approval.

Provincial approval took just over a month, and HME worked quickly, but it was early December before we were asked to come for the final touches. And that’s when we found out that though the vendor had supplied the parts correctly, all of the seat parts that the Bloorview Seating Clinic ordered were too small. They tried to brush it off by claiming that Jon had grown several inches since August. But since 1) they got other simple basics of the order wrong (like the type of seat belt latch we had all agreed on) and 2) WE’RE HIS PARENTS AND JUST NOT THAT STUPID (he had grown maybe one inch, if that) we just stared at them. They asked for another week, which turned into three. Just before Christmas, the new seat parts came in and we’re away to the races.

A chair that fits. Easy to push. Better for him to practise wheeling himself.

So onto the next challenge. In his new perfectly-fitting chair, Jon automatically slumps forward. What the ???

Well, we’ll see as the New Year progresses.

Comment by The Real David Barker — December 31, 2004 @ 2:56 pm

Woo hoo, Jon!

Happy New Chair!

Pardon the expression but you know me. Couldn’t help it.

December 26th, 2004

Happy Boxing Day!    

Posted by Peter.

Sorry for the quiet second half of December folks, it gets a little busy around here due to a self-created annual blitz. Every year, one of us (Laura this year) does up a New Year’s illustration and the two of us go into overdrive as we produce a New Year’s card, a fully designed Jon-themed calendar and DVD of Jon’s home movies for family, and we create a gifts for Jon’s teachers and Ed. Assistants– all of these based on that visual theme. So although we started into this when paying work had died down earlier this month, Laura and I were beavering away, up well past 2 am Christmas Eve working on the final design touches for the DVD and slipcase.

We go overboard.

So, in short, your card is on the way. And if you are family, you’ve got your calendar already, unless you live in the Yukon, in which case it’s on it’s way. DVD’s will be posted to the upper and lower West Coast in the next day or two.

Hey, maybe by New Year’s we’ll post a gallery of previous cards on Jon’s site. I’ve been meaning to do that… (Great, another deadline!)

December 22nd, 2004

Passover Effect    

Posted by Laura.

This week, two Ohio State University researchers published an enormous study that refutes the commonly-held belief that terminally-ill people can will themselves to live until significant dates (eg birthdays, Christmas, etc) have passed. This is known as the Passover effect (due to one study involving observant Jews over the high religious holidays) and has been noted – anecdotally – for years.

The current study looked at 300,000 terminally ill cancer patients and charted their deaths statistically around their birthdays as well as around Christmas and Thanksgiving (as the two most important U.S. holidays). No significant dip or peak in death rates was found around any of these dates.

The researchers noted that their results fly in the face of anecdotal evidence, but state that there may be much wishful thinking involved in believing that people can live longer through sheer force of will. Some authors of previous studies (such as the Passover study mentioned above) scoff at these new results, but there seems to be a lot of “how dare these grinches publish this right before Christmas”-type criticism flying around.

But whether or not this current study is valid, the lead author, biostatistician Donn Young gives sage advice: ?I think the most important thing for all of us to take away from this is the notion of attending to what is important. In other words, don’t put off what is meaningful in life. Do it now, before it is too late.? Wise words indeed. Happy Holidays!

December 20th, 2004

Blog spam make Peter-Hulk angry    

Posted by Peter.

Grrr. A very odd event, but the second time it has happened: I was deleting a spam comment to this post, and when I rebuilt it had become the message!!

The original message is gone. Not that it was much of a message. The first time it happened we thought it was an accident (hence the title of this post), but now that it’s happened twice, I’ll assume that someone clever with no life has found a little bug that allows this malicious hack. It apparently requires the right conditions–I must have been sloppy in how I went about deleting…very odd.

Comment by Derf Brikrab — December 21, 2004 @ 4:42 pm

Wretched issues, just when I was going to leave a comment.

Comment by Not David Barker — December 30, 2004 @ 2:23 pm

Hey! Why, you! I oughta -

Comment by Reid — January 11, 2005 @ 8:09 am

Hey Peter, I think the latest version of MT has some anti-comment-spam stuff in it. Of course, there is also always WordPress. :-)

Comment by Peter — January 11, 2005 @ 8:53 am

I’ll be testing WordPress somewhere else shortly. The latest version of MT does have that stuff, but given their rates don’t work for us. One author is allowed to have three blogs for free…but two authors have to pay US $70 for one blog. We’ll stick with the old version, which didn’t make that stipulation.

From what I’ve been reading, the Version 3 did not improve the spam situation, but they have hired someone famous for security coding and are working on some kind of upgrade.
But they do have this for all blog creators: the Six Apart Guide to Comment Spam at http://sixapart.com/pronet/comment_spam.html. Enjoy.

December 6th, 2004

Making Of Big Monkey    

Posted by Peter.

Just in case you don’t know already: Now that he’s finished with The Lord of the Rings, Peter Jackson is remaking King Kong (based on the 30’s version). He’s creating little five minute Production Diaries about various aspects of making it (some less serious than others). They are very well done and someone’s taking a lot of time to put these together. You’ll find them at kongisking.net. Now you know.

Comment by Reid — December 13, 2004 @ 9:15 am

I knew nothing of this until Peter had told me. Then I downloaded all the “making-of” clips and watched them all. They are fascinating. Peter Jackson is breaking a lot of rules regarding secrecy in making all this info available. Perhaps it’s because he’s being faithful to the original movie, and thus there are no plot secrets to be kept? Who is to say.

Highly recommended viewing. Very cinema verit? kind of stuff, not all polished and pre-digested like what you get as DVD “bonus materials”.

December 2nd, 2004

iTunes (Corollary)    

Posted by Laura.

The previous post – plus the disappointing fact that the iTunes store caters best to top-40-type tastes – got me thinking: what is the epitome of the perfect pop song? One of those confections that buries itself in your brain, probably boppy, probably short? Nothing deep or profound here, we’re talking pop!

I remember a radio interview with Tim Rice, who stated that his perfect example of a pop song was “My Little Runaway” by Del Shannon. Meh (tho’ it does have that great musitron solo). One of my top contenders is “Roll to Me” by Del Amitri (what is it about Dels and pop songs?)

Comment by aiabx — December 3, 2004 @ 12:53 am

3 faves;
Brand New Cadillac (The Clash do the best cover of it)
Don’t Worry Baby – The Beach Boys
Suffragette City – David Bowie (or maybe Rebel Rebel – I can’t decide)
-aiabx

Comment by David "Here For A Long, Long Time" Barker — December 3, 2004 @ 1:25 pm

Gilligan’s FREAKING Island.

And a lot of 80s New Wave that bounces around in there for a while if I even hear just a few words of it.

Comment by David "Me Again" Barker — December 3, 2004 @ 1:38 pm

Well, that didn’t work. I clicked the wrong thing. And I don’t know what it was.

I like the pretentious neo-romantic poseur cool stuff just to waste time, a little Culture Club, maybe, Thompson Twins. That sort of harmless drivel. Keeps me busy.

December 2nd, 2004

iTunes Canada    

Posted by Laura.

I’ve been excited for weeks about the upcoming arrival of the iTunes Canada store (being on a Mac prevents me from using any of the other Canadian online music stores.)

Problem is, now that it’s finally here my mind is completely blank as to songs I want to download!

Any favourites/suggestions?

Comment by Jeff K — December 2, 2004 @ 2:38 pm

Ah, an honest shopper much like myself. I find that my previous purchases on Amazon allow some good suggestions from their suggestion program. Similarly, Yahoo!music & Yahoo videos allow you to refine your tastes and exclude artists & genres you don’t like. I’ve found a fair bit of stuff that way.

If you’re feeling less honest but still don’t want to break any laws, check out a P2P network and do some random searches. Keep track of the tunes with the most servers serving them. You might be missing out on something.

Comment by Laura — December 2, 2004 @ 3:07 pm

P2P downloading (as opposed to uploading) may technically be not breaking any laws in Canada, but I’d rather pony up and at least theoretically see the artist provided with their tiny pittance rather than with nothing at all. I’m weird that way.

Comment by aiabx — December 3, 2004 @ 12:48 am

Well, since we Canadians already pay a levy on our storage media, you may as well download the music you’ve paid for, secure in the knowledge that Celine Dion will get the money you wanted Moxy Fruvous to get.
-aiabx

Comment by Laura — December 3, 2004 @ 9:31 am

That’s the one fly in supporting artist rights: Celine Dion :-)
It also annoys me having to support the recording industry fatcats along with the artists. I hope that the online stores start supporting independent artists more soon–I looked for a few of my favourite indy artists (Canadian and non-Canadian) in iTunes and couldn’t find a single one.

Trackback by ReidNews — December 13, 2004 @ 8:30 am

iTunes – MIA

Went to the iTunes Music Store last night, looking for music Luisa and I were talking about with the kids. Stuff like Pink Floyd’s “The Wall”. It wasn’t there. There were lots of other ‘Floyd albums, but not the top, number one album of my high school …